Taekkyeon and Others

Taekwondo and Korean Martial Arts

Course 1 · Chapter 7 · Taekkyeon and Other Korean Arts

Taekwondo is the best-known Korean martial art, but it is not the only one, and the others show a different pattern of history. Some, like ssireum and archery, are described as continuing for centuries. One, taekkyeon, is described as nearly lost and revived. Several, like hapkido, are described as creations of the decades after 1945. This chapter reads how the sources sort these arts, and how they treat the question each one raises: how old is it, really?

How this chapter was checked The facts here come from Wikipedia's articles on Korean martial arts, Taekkyeon and Hapkido, as I read them through the Wikipedia API. The Hapkido article is long and I read its introduction, etymology and its account of the founder; I did not read the biographies of the later figures. I read no books, federation websites or Daitō-ryū sources. This is a history and culture course and gives no instruction in techniques.
A note on tone Founders' training claims and lineage titles are disputed between organisations, and some of the people involved have living students and successors. I report the articles' statements and their owners. I describe people through their documented public roles only, and I do not judge whose account is right.

Taekkyeon Today

Chapter 2 told taekkyeon's revival. This chapter looks at the present. The Taekkyeon article says that after the 1987 deaths of Song Deok-gi and Shin Han-seung the community "was definitively split" and describes the groups:

Group (per the article)What it says about it
Korea Taekkyon Federation (KTF)Founded 1991; "the largest and most developed taekkyon association globally"; "the only taekkyon organization recognized by the Korean government's Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism"; a Korean Sport & Olympic Committee member since 2007; "instrumental in shaping the modern perception of taekkyon, promoting it as a non-violent folk-game focused on kicking techniques".
Widae Taekkyeon Preservation Society and World Taekkyeon FederationThe followers of Song Deok-gi. The Society "maintains a purely traditional approach and does not teach the sport science innovations from the mid-1980s and does not hold competitions". The World Taekkyeon Federation, incorporated in 2019 in Los Angeles, is led by Song's most senior student.
Korea Traditional Taekkyon Association (KTTA)Based in Chungju; set up by two pupils of Shin Han-seung; the article says it "was responsible for the recognition of Taekkyon as an Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity".
Kyulyun Taekkyon AssociationFounded in 2000; known for the annual Taekkyon Battle since 2004.

Two practices coexist. In sport taekkyon the article says competition "uses a limited subset of techniques, focusing on grappling and kicking only": points are scored "by throwing (or tripping) the opponent to the ground, pushing them out of the ring, or kicks to the head", with "no hand strikes or headbutts". In yetbeop ("old methods") taekkyon, sparring may include punches, open-handed strikes, elbows, knees, kicks, throws and clinch fighting. The article notes that taekkyeon "did not have a formal ranking structure until the 1970s" and that "due to the fragmented nature of the Taekkyon community, there is no universal standard"; Widae does not use formal ranks, and instructors judge skill.

Two descriptions of the same art The KTF's picture, as the article gives it, is of "a non-violent folk-game focused on kicking techniques". The yetbeop picture is of a broader fighting art that includes hand strikes, knees and elbows. Chapter 2's article says Shin Han-seung's modernising added forms and ranks the original lacked; the KTF article says it standardised rules with multilingual videos. A reader asking "what is taekkyeon?" gets different answers from different groups, and the article reports all of them without choosing.

Hapkido

The Hapkido article describes it as "a hybrid form of self-defense that employs joint locks, chokeholds, throwing techniques, kicks, punches, and other striking attacks", also teaching "traditional weapons". It says the art "was adapted from Daitō-ryū Aiki-jūjutsu as it was taught by Choi Yong-sool when he returned to Korea after World War II after having lived in Japan for 30 years", and that his disciples later "combined" it with "the kicking and striking techniques of indigenous and contemporary arts such as Taekkyon and Tang Soo Do, as well as various throwing techniques and ground fighting self-defense techniques from Japanese Judo". The Korean martial arts article says that because of "its early development by different instructors, Hapkido has no single standard curriculum".

The name is worth noting. The Hapkido article says the characters mean roughly "joining-energy-way" and notes that Japanese aikido and hapkido "share common technical origins" through the founders' Daitō-ryū training and "some Chinese characters", though they "differ significantly in philosophy, range of responses, and manner of executing techniques". It adds that this shared ancestry "has proved problematic in promoting hapkido internationally as a discipline with its own set of unique characteristics".

A founder's training: a contested account The article says "Choi Yong-sool's training in martial arts is a subject of contention". Choi, in an interview in the United States in 1980, claimed to have been adopted by Takeda Sōkaku at 11 and to have trained with him for 30 years. The article says this "is contradicted by other claims asserting that Choi was simply a worker in the home of Takeda", that enrolment records of Takeda's son "do not seem to include Choi's name", and that "except for claims made by Choi himself, there is little evidence that Choi was the adopted son of Takeda". It also reports that the current head of the main Daitō-ryū line has released a page from Takeda's register that contains Choi's name, and that "some scholars believe it is likely that Choi received most of his training in Daito Ryu from Yoshida Kotaro". It also cites a recollection attributed to Kisshomaru Ueshiba, repeating what his father said about a young Korean at a seminar, which is second-hand. Pulling these together, the sources agree Choi brought Daitō-ryū techniques to Korea and disagree on how much he trained and under whom.

How the Sources Sort the Arts

The Korean martial arts article gives a view of the 20th century that cuts across the individual stories. It says that after liberation in 1945, Japanese arts "such as Daitō-ryū Aiki-jūjutsu, karate, judo, and kendo were already widespread due to the colonial education system, while Chinese martial arts had a more limited influence". Taekwondo and hapkido "became the most prominent" of the new systems: "although their techniques were largely influenced by Japanese martial arts, their founders emphasized Korean identity and historical continuity, often through terminology, symbolism, and naming". It names further hybrids, "Hwa Rang Do, Hankido, and Kuk Sool", and the Hapkido article says two of Choi's students (named there) "went on to form the arts of Kuk Sool Won and modern Hwa Rang Do", with the caveat "though some argue that their training stems from time spent training under Kim Moo-hong".

GroupArts and what the article says
Described as long-continuousSsireum (wrestling): "probably the oldest martial discipline of Korea"; "survived into the modern era with relatively clear continuity"; federation in 1920; designated Important Intangible Cultural Property No. 131 in 2017; UNESCO-listed 2018, jointly with the North. Gungdo (archery): the composite bow was "Korea's primary weapon of war for centuries"; "not as severely affected" by occupation; National Intangible Cultural Heritage No. 142 in 2020.
Revived after a near-breakTaekkyeon: "recorded history dating back at least to the 18th century"; revived through Song Deok-gi; designated 1983 and UNESCO-listed 2011.
Mid-20th-century creations built on Japanese, Chinese and Korean sourcesTaekwondo, hapkido, Tang Soo Do (based "primarily" on karate as taught during the occupation, "with later indigenous influences"); Soo Bahk Do, developed by Hwang Kee "in the 1960's" and "inspired in part by Gwonbeop and Hwang's interpretation of the manual Muyedobotongji"; Hwa Rang Do, Hankido, Kuk Sool.
Late 20th and 21st centuryKyukgido, GongKwon Yusul, Kyeok Too Ki, Kunguk-Do (20th century); Yongmudo (created in 2001 by professors of Yong In University, "combining their martial arts and combat sports programs into a single hybrid").

The article's own summary sentence is the one to keep: "over time, some schools began emphasizing connections to traditional Korean martial arts and cultural heritage, though in many cases these links were largely symbolic rather than based on continuous practice". That is the same distinction Chapters 1, 2 and 3 drew for taekwondo, applied across the whole field. The article also says that from the 1960s to the 1970s "South Korea's military governments actively supported certain martial arts, particularly Taekwondo", and describes taekwondo as "standardized, institutionalized, and promoted as a national sport".

More small discrepancies
  • The Korean martial arts article lists Korean swordsmanship sources as "Muyejebo (1610), Muyeshinbo (1759), and Muyedobotongji (1790)". The Muye Dobo Tongji article gives 1795 for publication (1790 for the commission) and 1758 for the Muyesinbo. I use the Muye Dobo Tongji article's dates, as in Chapter 2.
  • The Korean martial arts article's taekwondo section calls it "the national martial art of both Korean states". Earlier chapters give 2018 as the date of the South Korean designation. I report the two-Korea phrasing as that article's and do not use any North Korean source to check it.
  • That section also says that after Choi's emigration "the name Choi Hong-hi and his works were to be erased from the memory of the South Korean people". No source for this appears in the passage, and it is stronger than the Choi article's account, which says World Taekwondo omits or criticises him. I do not rely on it.
  • The Korean martial arts article says Taekkyeon was "the first Korean martial art" to get official cultural recognition (1983), while the Taekkyeon article says it and ssireum are the two with "living national treasure" status. These are compatible (ssireum's designation, per the first article, came in 2017), but they are different claims.

Reading Rules From This Chapter

  1. Ask what kind of "old". Continuous (ssireum, gungdo), revived (taekkyeon), or a 20th-century creation with an older name or symbol. The sources use different words for each.
  2. A founder's account is a claim. Hapkido's founder, like taekwondo's, has an origin story that other records do not fully support.
  3. Names are not lineages. "Tang Soo Do" and "Soo Bahk Do", "hapkido" and "aikido", "subak" and "Soo Bahk Do" share sounds or characters without sharing a history.
  4. More than one version of one art. Taekkyeon's sport, yetbeop and Widae forms differ, and a statement about "taekkyeon" should say which.

Exercises

Exercise 1

Describe the two modern forms of taekkyeon (sport and yetbeop) and say how the Widae Preservation Society differs from the KTF. Then explain why "taekkyeon" in a news item may need further information to be understood.

Exercise 2

Give the Hapkido article's account of hapkido's technical sources, and state what is contested about Choi Yong-sool's training. Which points do the sources agree on?

Exercise 3

Sort ssireum, taekkyeon, taekwondo, Soo Bahk Do and Yongmudo into the article's groups (continuous, revived, mid-20th-century, newer) and give one supporting phrase for each. Then quote the article's sentence about symbolic links and say how it connects to earlier chapters.

Quick Reference

  • Taekkyeon today: KTF (largest; government-recognised), Widae (traditional; no ranks or competitions), KTTA, Kyulyun; sport vs yetbeop versions
  • Hapkido: Daitō-ryū techniques via Choi Yong-sool, plus kicks and other elements; no single curriculum; founder's training contested
  • Sorting: ssireum and gungdo continuous; taekkyeon revived; taekwondo, hapkido, Tang Soo Do, Soo Bahk Do mid-20th-century; Yongmudo 2001
  • Key quote: links to tradition "largely symbolic rather than based on continuous practice"
  • Check: 1790/1795 and 1758/1759 for the manuals; "both Korean states"; Choi Hong-hi "erased" claim; any "oldest" claim

Next chapter: The Dojang, which looks at the training hall, the uniform, etiquette, the tenets and philosophy attached to taekwondo, and how much is documented history and how much later teaching.