Silla and Balhae

Korean History

Course 1 · Chapter 4 · Unified Silla and Balhae

In 668 Goguryeo fell to a Silla–Tang alliance. Within two years the allies were at war, and when it ended Silla held the peninsula south of the Taedong River while a new state, Balhae, rose in the north. This chapter follows the war, the Silla that came out of it, Balhae and the argument over whose history it is, and the rebellions that ended Silla in 935.

How this chapter was checked The facts come from four Wikipedia articles: Unified Silla, Balhae (the article is titled Parhae), Silla–Tang War and Later Three Kingdoms, all read through a summarising tool, so exact wording may differ from the pages. The tool read Unified Silla, Silla–Tang War and Later Three Kingdoms in full. For Balhae it read only the first 100,000 of about 219,650 characters, through the Goryeo subsection; I did not see the Culture, Society, Government, Military, Language, Economy or Controversies sections. Details the tool said came from general knowledge are left out or marked unverified. My own material is marked "mine". I read no sites from North Korea.

The Silla–Tang War

The article dates the war to 670 to 676 in the infobox and lead (a cited work in the article says Silla fought Tang "from 668 to 676"). After the two allies conquered Baekje and Goguryeo, the Tang placed the former kingdoms under its own administration. The article says Silla wanted the Tang out and itself protected from Tang control, and that Silla was angered because Emperor Taizong had promised Baekje and the lands south of Pyongyang in return for its help, but Gaozong "reneged". Revolts in former Goguryeo territory helped Silla, and loyalists of both fallen kingdoms joined its army.

DateEvent (as the article states it)
668Conquest of Goguryeo, which "marked the end of the Three Kingdoms period"
669First Goguryeo revolt
671Silla drove Tang forces out of most of former Baekje
Feb 675Tang defeated Silla at Chiljung Fortress; the king sent an apologetic tribute mission and Gaozong withdrew troops to face Tibet
Sep 675The Samguk sagi reports a Silla victory over Li Jinxing's 200,000 at Maeso, with 30,080 war horses captured
Nov 676Silla won the naval battle of Gibeolpo (details unknown beyond the generals' names)
Contested or inconsistent in the article The infobox says "Silla victory"; the lead says the conflict "ended in a truce". The Maeso account is heavily hedged: Kim Byeong-Hee reads it as Tang forces already retreating with no major battle, calls the 200,000 figure symbolic (the fortress could not have held 30,080 horses), and the Zizhi Tongjian suggests Tang held Maeso and omits a Silla win. The Cheonseong siege date is printed as September "765", almost certainly a typo for 675; its figures (1,400 Tang dead, 1,000 horses and 40 warships captured) are given without caveats though from the same contested sources. The article's own citation says Chinese histories claim Tang victories in 674 and 675 while Korean accounts report Chinese defeats. The Tang seat is "Liaoyang" in one section and "Liaodong" in another, and one general is Xue Rengui in the text and Liu Rengui in a citation. I report these as the article gives them.

The Settlement

  • Border. Silla held the territory south of the Taedong River; Tang kept former Goguryeo land north of it. The article describes the line as running "from the mouth of the Taedong River in the west to the East Korea Bay".
  • Tang administration. The Protectorate General to Pacify the East, based in Pyongyang, was set up for the former Goguryeo, with 9 commanderies, 42 prefectures and 100 counties. It was later moved to Liaodong (or Liaoyang), which the article calls "effectively the end of Tang designs on Sillan territory".
  • Relations. Silla and Tang cut ties until the early eighth century, and Tang formally recognised Silla's sovereignty south of the Taedong in 736.

The Unified Silla article's summary of the unification names King Munmu as ordering the 660 attacks on Baekje, with Kim Yu-sin defeating Gyebaek. I have not checked the reign dates and cannot say whether the 660 attribution is exact; a source on the Silla kings would settle it.

Unified Silla

The Unified Silla article gives 668 to 935 ("lasted for 267 years"). The infobox splits it as "United Silla 668–892" and "Unified Silla (Later Silla) 892–935", while the body treats it as one period.

  • Capital. Gyeongju (Seorabeol), which the article calls "the fourth-largest city in the world at the time".
  • Rule. A small "bone clan" ruled a large population; officials were chosen by bone rank (Korean History 3) rather than examination, so the National Confucian University had little appeal for the nobility.
  • Art and religion. The article calls it a golden age and cites Hwangnyongsa, Seokguram and the Emille Bell. Bulguksa was built in the mid-eighth century; the article gives no date for Seokguram. A woodblock-printed sutra is dated to 751 CE. Buddhism was the state religion.
  • Trade. Silla dominated East Asian seas and trade in the eighth and ninth centuries, "most notably during the time of Chang Pogo" (the article's spelling). Cheonghaejin is not mentioned in the article.
  • A term in dispute. North Korean historians reject "Unified Silla" and use "Late Silla", because in their view Goryeo first unified the Korean people. The article presents it as a contested framing.

Balhae

The infobox gives 698 to 926. The article says Tae Choyŏng (Da Zuorong) founded it in 698 and was first called King of Zhen (Jin) until 713, when the name became Parhae (Balhae); the Tang granted the ruler the title "Prince of Commandery of Bohai" in 713 (or 714) and formally recognised a kingdom in 762. It also notes that the New Book of Tang and Old Book of Tang disagree on who fled with a companion named Kŏlsa Piu, and that Tae Choyŏng and Tae Chungsang may be the same person; it leaves this unresolved.

Whose history is Balhae? The article presents competing claims, and I show each with its owner. Korean scholars (North and South) usually treat Balhae as a Korean state; they read the Old Book of Tang's term biezhong ("separate kind") as "a branch of the Goguryeo people", point to a 727 or 728 Balhae envoy saying it had "recovered the lost land of Goguryeo", and note that Japanese records called it a "state of Go[gu]ryeo". Chinese and Japanese researchers read biezhong as "distinct from Goguryeo"; Chinese scholars say the Mohe formed the majority and treat it as a provincial power with autonomy. Russian scholars are divided: some place it in Manchurian history and some say it was neither Korean nor Chinese. The Samguk sagi's author Kim Pusik did not consider Balhae Korean. The article quotes Kim and Min Kyounghyoun on Chinese and Korean historians "alternatively regard[ing]" it as one or the other, "based on intrinsically subjective positions". I do not choose.
  • Population mix. Sloane: the royalty and upper class were Goguryeo and the majority Mohe. Korean scholars: a Goguryeo ruling class and a Malgal (Mohe) population; a minority hold that it was entirely Goguryeo descendants. Estimates: about 500,000 (the Old Book, 100,000 households); 1.5 to 4 million (Crossley, as the article gives modern estimates).
  • Foreign relations. 732: a Balhae naval force attacked Dengzhou. 733: a joint Tang–Silla attack failed after a blizzard, with half of a 100,000-strong army said to have died. 734: Silla attacked without success. 735: Tang allowed Silla troops in the Paegang region. 911: Silla allied with Balhae against the Khitans; 925: Silla allied with the Khitans instead.
  • Fall. Abaoji's Khitan forces captured Buyeo and besieged the capital Shangjing, and the king surrendered. The infobox dates the fall to 14 January 926; the body dates the Buyeo siege to 14 February, six days before the capital was besieged, which would put the fall in late February. The article says Balhae's independence ended in 929 and it was absorbed into the Liao in 936.
  • Refugees. The crown prince Tae Kwanghyŏn and many elites fled to Goryeo. Estimates: 120,600 (Park Jong-gi), 100,000 to 200,000 (Korean historians generally), no more than 100,000 (Crossley). The article puts 120,600 at "approximately 6.3%" of Goryeo's roughly 2 million, which works out nearer 6.0%.
  • Naming. The article lists Balhae among the "Northern and Southern States" of Korea and says "modern Korean scholars usually consider Parhae a Korean state" on that basis. It adds that Jee, Kim and Jun argue that the choice of transliteration "inevitably entails a degree of modern political projection".

The Slide Into the Later Three Kingdoms

The Unified Silla article says rebel groups and factions in the newly conquered territories made the state unstable, leading to the Later Three Kingdoms in the late ninth century, but it describes no specific rebellions. The Later Three Kingdoms article says its dates "are loosely defined and differ across academic sources": 889 (the first major rebellions), 892 (Kyŏn Hwŏn captures Gwangju and founds Later Baekje at Jeonju) or 900 (Later Baekje proclaimed a kingdom) for the start, and 935 (Gyeongsun, the last Silla king, surrenders to Goryeo) or 936 (Goryeo conquers Later Baekje) for the end. Its sidebar gives Taebong (Later Goguryeo) as 901 to 918 and Goryeo as 918 to 1392, but the article describes no event for either, so Gungye and Wang Geon belong to Korean History 5. The article's sidebar also lists Jeongan (938 to 986) inside a period that ends in 936, spells Later Baekje two ways, and says most of the article was copied from worldhistory.org, so I rely on it only for those dates.

What to Take from This

My own reading, unverified: the same geographic fact decides much of this chapter. The Taedong line left Silla with the south and its capital in the southeast, and left the north to a state that both Koreans and Chinese now claim. The article shows the claims, not a resolution.

What the Sources Left Open

  • Who won the Silla–Tang War: "Silla victory" or "a truce", and what happened at Maeso.
  • Which king ordered the 660 attack on Baekje.
  • Balhae's ethnic and political identity, its population, and its fall date.
  • Whether Balhae's people were Goguryeo, Mohe, or a mixture, and what share of each.
  • The date of Seokguram, and the specific rebellions that ended Silla.
  • The start and end of the Later Three Kingdoms (889, 892 or 900; 935 or 936).

Exercises

Exercise 1

Using the Silla–Tang table, write a four-line account of the war from 668 to 676. Mark which dates the article treats as firm and which it hedges or contradicts.

Exercise 2

State the Korean, Chinese and Russian positions on Balhae in one sentence each, naming the evidence each side uses, and then say what "Late Silla" versus "Unified Silla" tells you about whose history is being told.

Exercise 3

Find four places where this chapter's articles contradict themselves (dates, figures or labels). For each, say how you would try to settle it and what you would not conclude without a further source.

Quick Reference

  • Silla–Tang War: 670 to 676; Tang left south of the Taedong; recognised Silla in 736
  • Unified Silla: 668 to 935; capital Gyeongju; golden age of Buddhist art; bone-rank rule
  • Balhae: 698 to 926; Tae Choyŏng; Tang recognition 762; fell to the Khitans; refugees to Goryeo
  • Balhae claims: Korean (Goguryeo successor), Chinese (Mohe majority, provincial), Russian (divided)
  • Later Three Kingdoms: loosely 889 or 892 to 935 or 936
  • Habits: a "victory" and a "truce" can be the same war; every fall date and head-count is an account

Next: Korean History 5 follows Wang Geon and Goryeo, from 918 to the Mongol period.