Projections
History of Maps and Cartography
Course 1 · Chapter 5 · Mercator and Map Projections
A sphere cannot be flattened without stretching, tearing or squashing something, a fact proved in the nineteenth century by Gauss (check). Every flat map of the world is therefore a compromise, and a projection is a rule for choosing which distortions to accept. This chapter explains what Mercator's famous map was designed to do, what its critics say, and how other projections trade one kind of accuracy for another. Names and dates are from general knowledge and flagged "check".
The Problem
Orange peel
Peel an orange and try to press the skin flat: it splits or stretches. A map projection is a mathematical way of doing the same job with rules.
Four properties
A projection can try to keep shape (locally), area, distance or direction, but no flat map keeps all of them for the whole world (check).
Three families
Maps can be projected as if onto a cylinder, a cone or a flat plane. The shape of the surface and where it touches the globe decide where the distortion is smallest (check).
Mercator's Projection
- Date. Gerard Mercator published his world map in 1569 (check).
- The aim. A line of constant compass bearing, a rhumb line, appears as a straight line, which helps a navigator plot a course with a ruler and a compass (check).
- The cost. Areas grow larger towards the poles. Greenland looks as large as Africa, though Africa is about fourteen times larger (check the ratio).
- The use. It is a navigator's chart, and was never designed as a wall map of the world's countries, though that is how it was used for centuries.
- Web maps. A close relative, Web Mercator, is used by many online maps, because it keeps shapes right at city scale (check; Chapter 9).
| Projection (check each) | Keeps | Distorts |
|---|---|---|
| Mercator, 1569 | Local shapes and compass bearings | Area, strongly near the poles |
| Gall–Peters (equal-area), 1855 and 1973 | Area | Shape; countries look stretched near the equator |
| Mollweide, 1805 | Area | Shape near the edges |
| Robinson, 1963 | A pleasing look, a compromise | Everything a little; not strictly equal area or conformal |
| Winkel tripel, 1921 | A compromise of area, distance and angle | Everything a little; adopted by National Geographic in 1998 |
| Azimuthal equidistant | Distances and directions from the centre point | Shape and area far from the centre |
Choosing a Projection
| Task | A sensible choice (check) |
|---|---|
| Plotting a compass course | Mercator |
| Comparing areas, such as population density | An equal-area projection |
| A general wall map | A compromise projection such as Winkel tripel |
| Flight routes | A globe, or a map in which great circles appear straight, such as a gnomonic projection |
| Local survey maps | A projection fitted to the region, such as the Transverse Mercator on which the British National Grid is based |
Exercises
Explain why Greenland looks so large on a Mercator map, and what Mercator's design was meant to achieve.
Choose a projection for each of three tasks (a sailing course, a map of population density, a wall map for a school) and give a reason.
Use an orange peel, a globe or a free online tool that compares projections, and write three observations about distortion.
Quick Reference
- No perfect map: a sphere cannot be flattened without distortion
- Mercator: straight compass lines, inflated polar areas
- Equal-area: true size, stretched shape
- Compromise: Robinson, Winkel tripel
- Rule: choose the projection to fit the task