Chaturanga and Shatranj
The History of Chess
Course 13 · Chapter 2 · Chaturanga and Shatranj
The first chapter gave the broad route of the game. This chapter looks at its first two stages: chaturanga in India and shatranj in Persia and the Islamic world. The evidence is thin and often late, which makes it a good lesson in how historians weigh sources. Names, dates and details are flagged "check"; the broad outline agrees with general surveys, but individual claims have not been checked against primary texts.
Chaturanga in India
The name
Chaturanga is a Sanskrit word usually translated "four limbs" or "four divisions", and in Indian sources it also names the four parts of an army: elephants, chariots, cavalry and infantry (check).
The date
Surveys place the earliest chess-like game in northern India by about the sixth century CE, with some sources suggesting the fifth and others the seventh (check). The date is a range, not a fixed point.
The pieces
The pieces reflected the army: a king, a counsellor, elephants, horses, chariots and foot-soldiers. The elephant, horse and chariot are the ancestors of the bishop, knight and rook (check each).
From India to Persia
The game reached Persia, probably in the sixth or seventh century, where it was called chatrang in Middle Persian (Pahlavi). Several Persian texts mention it. The best known are:
| Text (check each) | What it says | How to weigh it |
|---|---|---|
| The Karnamak of Ardashir | Describes the founder of the Sasanian dynasty as skilled at chatrang. | Often called the earliest literary mention, but the text is full of legend and its date is disputed. It shows the game was known when the text was composed, not when Ardashir lived. |
| The Book of Chess (Mādayān ī chatrang) | A story of an Indian challenge to the Persian court, solved by a clever courtier. | A Pahlavi text, thought to date from about the seventh century (check). Valuable, but a story rather than a record. |
| The Shahnameh | Ferdowsi's epic of about 1010 retells the story and adds a legend of two half-brothers who contest a throne in India. | Much later than the events, and told as legend. |
Shatranj in the Islamic World
After the Arab conquest of Persia in the seventh century, the game passed into the Islamic world, where the Persian name was adapted as shatranj (check). It was widely played in the courts and in cities, and it produced a literature of its own: problems, study positions and treatises written from about the ninth century (check).
| Shatranj piece (check each) | Move | Modern descendant |
|---|---|---|
| Shah (king) | One square in any direction | King |
| Firzan or ferz (counsellor) | One square diagonally | Queen |
| Fil (elephant) | Two squares diagonally, jumping over a piece | Bishop |
| Faras (horse) | As the modern knight | Knight |
| Rukh (chariot) | As the modern rook | Rook |
| Baidaq (foot-soldier) | One square forward; captures diagonally; promotes to the counsellor | Pawn |
The shatranj queen and bishop were short-range pieces, so the game was slower than the modern one. One result was a different idea of winning: a player could also win by capturing every piece but the king, and rules about stalemate differed (check). Here is a simple way to represent the shatranj pieces and their one-step movement in code, a tool for exploring the old rules.
The Wheat Legend
A famous story says a ruler offered the inventor of the game any reward, and the inventor asked for one grain of wheat on the first square, two on the second, four on the third, and so on, doubling on each of the 64 squares. The total is 264 − 1, about 1.8 × 1019 grains, far more than any kingdom could supply (check). The arithmetic is sound. The story itself is a legend about exponential growth, attached to chess in medieval sources, and no one can show that it records a real event (check).
Evidence, Weighed
| Claim (check each) | Evidence | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Chess began in India | Consistent later Persian and Arabic traditions; the name and piece types point to an Indian army; early finds of pieces | The usual view, though the details are thin and the date is a range |
| Chess is thousands of years old | Some very early boards and pieces have been called chess, but they are not clearly chess | Unproven; treat with caution |
| Ardashir played chess | A late and legendary text | Not reliable for the third century |
| Shatranj was widely played by the ninth century | Treatises, problems and later literary references | Well supported |
Exercises
Explain the route of the name from chaturanga to chatrang to shatranj, and say what the pieces of the Indian game represented.
Calculate the number of grains on the 64th square of the wheat legend, and on all 64 squares together. Say why this makes the story a legend rather than a record.
The Karnamak says Ardashir played chess. Give two reasons a historian would be cautious about using it as evidence for the third century.
Quick Reference
- Names: chaturanga (India), chatrang (Persia), shatranj (Arabic)
- Old pieces: shah, ferz, fil, faras, rukh, baidaq
- Texts: the Karnamak, the Book of Chess, the Shahnameh
- Method: note how late each source is, and whether it is story or record