Dictionaries and Rules

The History of the English Language

Course 1 · Chapter 8 · Dictionaries and Rules

By 1600 English had a written standard and a flood of new words. The next question was who would keep order. Dictionaries tried to list the words, and grammar books tried to say what was correct. This chapter looks at the first English dictionaries, Samuel Johnson's of 1755, Robert Lowth's grammar of 1762, and the sources' account of where two famous "rules" came from.

The story in one box Wikipedia's A Table Alphabeticall article calls Robert Cawdrey's 1604 book the first monolingual English dictionary. The article on Johnson's Dictionary says it was published in 1755 and recorded English "as it appeared in use". The Split infinitive article finds no prohibition in any text before the 19th century, and the Linguistic prescription article says tentative advice, such as marking a form as colloquial, can turn into an absolute ban in the classroom.
Watch out Some rules attributed to eighteenth-century grammarians are less strict than their reputation. The Robert Lowth article says his preposition rule was tentative and that he used the construction himself, and the Split infinitive article finds no objection in Lowth at all. The "rules" often became rules later, in schools.

Hard words and first dictionaries

Wikipedia's A Table Alphabeticall article describes a 1604 English dictionary by Robert Cawdrey, published in London, considered the first monolingual English dictionary.

  • Size: about 120 pages with 2,543 headwords in the first edition (the Johnson article gives 2,449 words; I show both). The fourth edition of 1617 had 3,264.
  • Purpose: to explain "hard words" that spread with the printing press and the English Bible. The article quotes Cawdrey's aim of helping "unskillful persons".
  • Content: very brief definitions, often a single word, working as synonyms.
  • Survival: the only known surviving copy is in the Bodleian Library, Oxford.

The article on Johnson's Dictionary lists earlier works: Elyot's Latin-English wordbook (1538), Mulcaster's (1583) and Florio's (1598), the first to use quotations. The Early Modern English article read in Chapter 6 gives 1604 as the date of the first English dictionary, which matches.

Johnson's Dictionary

Wikipedia's article on A Dictionary of the English Language gives these facts:

ItemWhat the article says
CommissionBy London booksellers in June 1746, for 1,500 guineas
Time takenSeven years, though Johnson had claimed he could finish in three; he worked largely alone, with clerical help copying quotations
Publication15 April 1755 (the page elsewhere gives 4 April for the folio volumes; both shown)
SizeA 42,773-word list, with around 114,000 literary quotations from about 500 authors, most often Shakespeare, Milton and Dryden
MethodIllustrated meanings with quotations, separated senses, added usage notes; his Plan compared usage to legal precedent, treating custom as the authority
Weak pointThe article calls his etymologies weak by modern standards
Later influenceThe OED reproduced about 1,700 of his definitions, marked "J."; it was translated into French and German

The article says Johnson wanted to fix grammar, definitions and spelling for a growing reading public, and that earlier dictionaries were mostly glossaries of "hard words". It calls much of the work prescriptivist and linguistically conservative, with traditional spellings such as publick. It also says Johnson himself doubted that language could be fixed: the Linguistic prescription article quotes his Preface saying sounds remain too volatile and subtle for legal restraints, and notes his example of the French Academy's failure to stop change. Famous definitions include a lexicographer as "a harmless drudge" and excise as a "hateful tax", both from the article.

Grammar books and rules

Wikipedia's Linguistic prescription article defines prescriptivism as setting rules for preferred usage, and descriptivism, the approach of academic linguistics, as recording how language is actually used without judgement. It says the two overlap, and lists its caveats: standards often favour one class or region, prescription can present non-standard forms as mistakes, and rules become entrenched and slow to update.

Wikipedia's Robert Lowth article says he published A Short Introduction to English Grammar in 1762 to fill a gap, since simple textbook grammars were scarce, and that it stayed in standard school use until the early 20th century.

  • Method: he criticised "false syntax", drawing examples from Shakespeare, the King James Bible, Milton, Pope and others. His grammar was shaped by Latin, which he admitted was problematic.
  • Prepositions at the end of a sentence: he tentatively suggested this is inappropriate in formal writing, though he used it himself; the article notes Dryden expressed the same view in 1672. The Linguistic prescription article says his remark that it "sounds colloquial" later hardened into a rule.
  • Other judgements: he judged whose for things improper and condemned a "Who should I meet" construction. The article calls his assertions "dogmatic" and says his stylistic opinions came to carry the force of law in schools.

Case study: the split infinitive

Wikipedia's Split infinitive article defines it as an adverb between to and the verb, as in "to boldly go".

DateFact (per the article)
early 13th centuryLayamon's Brut has a pronoun splitting the infinitive, possibly for metre
14th centuryWycliffe's prose splits infinitives often
1803John Comly's objection, the earliest the article cites
1834An anonymous American writer advises against it
1864Henry Alford's Plea for the Queen's English makes the objection widely known
1890The term "split infinitive" is first recorded

The article finds no prohibition in Lowth or in any text before the 19th century. Critics often cited Latin, where the infinitive is a single word, but the article notes little primary evidence that early critics actually relied on this. It says modern style manuals generally accept simple split infinitives, and that some guides still advise avoiding them in formal writing. The Linguistic prescription article gives the same 1834 advice and says the old prohibition persists.

Words to know

TermMeaning
Monolingual dictionaryA dictionary that explains words in the same language
HeadwordThe word listed and defined in a dictionary entry
PrescriptiveSaying how language should be used
DescriptiveRecording how language is actually used
Preposition strandingEnding a clause with a preposition, as in "the man I spoke to"
LexicographerA person who writes a dictionary

✏️ Try It Yourself

Think of the answer first, then click to check.

1. What is A Table Alphabeticall, and when was it published?

Show answer

Robert Cawdrey's 1604 dictionary, considered the first monolingual English dictionary, explaining "hard words".

2. Why do the two articles disagree about its size?

Show answer

The Table Alphabeticall article gives 2,543 headwords and the Johnson article gives 2,449; they do not reconcile them, so both are shown.

3. When was Johnson's Dictionary published, and how long did it take?

Show answer

1755 (15 April, with 4 April given for the folios); commissioned in 1746, it took seven years.

4. What was new about Johnson's use of quotations?

Show answer

He illustrated meanings with about 114,000 literary quotations from about 500 authors; the article says Florio's 1598 work was the first to use quotations at all.

5. What is the difference between prescriptive and descriptive approaches?

Show answer

Prescriptive sets rules for preferred usage; descriptive records how language is actually used without judgement.

6. What does the article say about Lowth's rule on ending a sentence with a preposition?

Show answer

He suggested it tentatively and used it himself; the rule hardened later.

7. When does the article say the split infinitive objection first appears?

Show answer

With John Comly in 1803; it finds no prohibition in any earlier text.

8. Why does the article doubt that Latin was the real reason?

Show answer

Critics cited Latin's one-word infinitive, but the article notes little primary evidence that early critics relied on it.

Note on sources This chapter uses Wikipedia's A Dictionary of the English Language, A Table Alphabeticall, Split infinitive and Robert Lowth (all whole pages) and Linguistic prescription (the first 100,000 of about 108,567 characters), each as the page tool summarised it. The Linguistic prescription page did not discuss Murray, Swift or English academy proposals, and the Robert Lowth page did not mention double negatives, so I do not cover them. I did not read the dictionary or any grammar. The articles differ on Cawdrey's headword count (2,543 and 2,449) and on Johnson's publication date, and I show both. The phrases quoted from Johnson's definitions are the articles' own wording. The word definitions are mine and unverified.
Coming up in Chapter 9: English Goes Abroad. English in North America and elsewhere, the beginnings of American English, and why varieties differ.