The Great Vowel Shift

The History of the English Language

Course 1 · Chapter 6 · The Great Vowel Shift

Why do the letters in meet, bite and mate not match the sounds as they would in many other languages? Much of the answer, according to the sources, is the Great Vowel Shift, a series of changes to English long vowels between about 1400 and 1700. This chapter sets out what the sources say changed, when, and what scholars still argue about.

The story in one box Wikipedia's Great Vowel Shift article describes a set of pronunciation changes to the long vowels, "mainly between 1400 and 1700", starting in southern England. It says the shift is "the major reason English spellings now often deviate considerably" from pronunciation, because spelling did not adapt to the changes. The causes, and the exact order of the changes, are disputed.
Watch out The sound symbols below (in slashes) are the International Phonetic Alphabet, used by the article; the colon-like mark means a long vowel. The values are the article's reconstructions, not recordings, and the article says scholars dispute some of them. The Early Modern English article also flags its own vowel section as possibly original synthesis needing more citations. Treat the details as a model, not a transcript.

What changed

The Great Vowel Shift article describes the long vowels moving up, and the highest ones breaking into diphthongs (two-part vowels). Its examples:

BeforeAfterExample wordWhat happened
/iː//aɪ/biteThe close front vowel became a diphthong
/uː//aʊ/outThe close back vowel became a diphthong
/eː//iː/meetA close-mid vowel rose
/oː//uː/bootA close-mid vowel rose
/ɛː//eː/, then /iː/meatAn open-mid vowel rose in two steps
/ɔː//oː/, then /oʊ/boatAn open-mid vowel rose, then changed again
/aː//æː/, /ɛː/, then /eɪ/mateThe open vowel rose in several steps

The article adds that /uː/ did not shift before labial consonants or after /j/, as in soup, which is why soup does not sound like out. Some consonant changes where sounds became silent are sometimes included under the same name.

When

  • Overall: mainly between 1400 and 1700, according to the article. Changes after 1700 are not counted as part of it.
  • First phase: completed around 1500.
  • Second phase: /aː/ was raised around 1550, and the open-mid vowels after 1600.

The Middle English and Chancery Standard articles, as read in Chapters 3 and 4, place the start of spelling standardisation in the same century, the 15th, so the spellings were fixed while the sounds were moving. The Early Modern English article says its period began in the late 15th century and that Modern English was "fully" in place by 1714, with spelling still fluid until Johnson's Dictionary in 1755.

Why did it happen?

The article does not say. It gives two proposals about the order of the changes:

ModelProposed byIdea
Push chainLassThe close-mid vowels rose first and pushed the closest vowels, /iː/ and /uː/, into diphthongs
Drag chainHandkeThe closest vowels broke into diphthongs first, leaving a gap the others rose into; based on a phonetic split between high and like/my

The article does not discuss social theories, so I do not describe any. On the values of the new diphthongs, it says Lass thinks /iː uː/ became /ei ou/ around 1500 and shifted further later, while Dobson, Kökeritz and Cercignani argue they were centralised and lowered at once, and Stockwell (1961) proposed a third route. I show these disagreements and do not choose.

What it explains about spelling

The article says "English spelling did not adapt to the changes", while German spelling did (the example it gives is bīzen becoming beißen). Spelling kept the older vowel values, so the vowel letters in English words such as bite and mate no longer match the sounds the same letters stand for in the older values. The Early Modern English article gives related evidence: both Early Modern and Modern English "retain various orthographical conventions that predate the Great Vowel Shift", and doom and come rhyme in Shakespeare.

Other sound changes in Early Modern English

The Early Modern English article lists other changes in the same centuries, with the caution above:

  • Initial clusters such as /wr kn ɡn/ were pronounced in full and had reduced by the 16th to 17th centuries (compare the silent letters in write and knee).
  • The /h/ of wh was kept for a time, so wine and whine differed.
  • The sound of gh was lost.
  • Would and should began losing the /l/ by the 1640s.

Words to know

TermMeaning
Long vowelA vowel held longer than a short one; in Middle English a separate sound, not just a spelling
DiphthongA vowel that glides from one sound to another
Push chainA change where one sound moves and pushes the next out of the way
Drag chainA change where a sound moves into a gap and drags others after it
IPAThe International Phonetic Alphabet, a system for writing sounds
MergerWhen two sounds become one

✏️ Try It Yourself

Think of the answer first, then click to check.

1. What are the dates the article gives for the Great Vowel Shift?

Show answer

Mainly between 1400 and 1700, with the first phase completed around 1500.

2. What happened to the highest long vowels, /iː/ and /uː/?

Show answer

They became diphthongs: /iː/ to /aɪ/ (bite) and /uː/ to /aʊ/ (out).

3. What happened to /eː/ and /oː/?

Show answer

They rose to /iː/ (meet) and /uː/ (boot).

4. What is the difference between a push chain and a drag chain?

Show answer

In the push chain (Lass) the close-mid vowels rose first and pushed the closest ones into diphthongs; in the drag chain (Handke) the closest vowels broke up first and the others rose into the gap.

5. Why does soup not sound like out?

Show answer

The article says /uː/ did not shift before labial consonants or after /j/.

6. What does the article say about German spelling and the shift?

Show answer

German spelling was changed to match the changes (bīzen became beißen), while English spelling did not adapt.

7. Which rhyme in Shakespeare is given as evidence of sounds moving away from the spelling?

Show answer

Doom and come rhyme (per the Early Modern English article).

8. Name two other sound changes in this period.

Show answer

For example the reduction of initial wr and kn clusters, the loss of the sound of gh, and the loss of /l/ in would and should by the 1640s.

Note on sources This chapter uses Wikipedia's Great Vowel Shift (the whole article) and Early Modern English (the first 100,000 of about 113,063 characters), each as the page tool summarised it. The Great Vowel Shift article, as the page tool gave it, does not mention mice and mouse, Chaucer's spelling or social theories, so I do not describe them. I use only the words the article gives as examples. The Early Modern English article flags its vowel section as possibly original synthesis, and I say so. I did not read any phonetic study. The word definitions and the sentence on what spelling "now often represents" are mine and unverified.
Coming up in Chapter 7: Shakespeare and the Bible. The Renaissance flood of new words, Shakespeare's English, the King James Bible, and what is and is not a "Shakespeare coinage".