Questions and Negation

Middle English Grammar 1

Chapter 8 · Questions and Negation

📜 Questions and Negation

This chapter has a lopsided source base. Wikipedia's Middle English article has no syntax section, so it says nothing about how questions were formed. Negation is better covered: the article Jespersen's cycle traces ne, ne ... not and not with dated figures. I give what I could read, and say clearly what I could not.

The rule in one box Negation passed through three stages: ne alone, then ne ... not around the verb, then not alone (reached in the 15th century). Word order moved from "relatively free" towards a stricter order as endings wore away. Questions: no source I could read describes them, so the chapter gives no rule for them.

The three stages of negation

StagePatternExample given
Old Englishne before the verbic ne secge (I do not say)
Middle English, stage twone ... not around the verbI ne seye not (I NEG say not)
Stage threenot alone, reached in the 15th centuryI say not
  • Where not comes from. The article says noht led to the second stage. In the past-tense example, Old English ic ne geseah ("I didn't see") became Middle English I ne ysauȝ nauȝt (NEG saw nothing). nauȝt comes from Old English nawiht, "no thing". Early Modern English then has "I saw not".
  • Emphasis in Old English. It was optionally added with na, nalles and noht.

The dated figures

The article cites Phillip Wallage's study of the Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English, which counted sentential negation (complex examples excluded). The most common pattern in each period:

PeriodMost common patternShare
1150–1250ne alone60.5%
1250–1350ne + not67.7%
1350–1420not alone87.5%
1420–1500not alone98.2%

The article does not break these figures down by dialect or text type, so I cannot say whether Northern, Midland or Southern writers differed, or what Chaucer did. Those figures are percentages across the whole corpus.

Word order

  • The Middle English article says Old Norse contact helped move English from a language with "relatively free word order" to a more analytic one with stricter order, attributing this to the erosion of inflectional endings in the Danelaw.
  • It also describes a general shift "from inflections to fixed word order" in early Middle English, and says other Germanic languages did the same, more slowly.

Do

The article Do-support says that in Middle English auxiliary do "apparently had a meaning contribution", marking aspect, probably perfective but in some cases imperfective. In Early Modern English that meaning was lost, and the use of do forms came to resemble today's. It gives no dates for when this began and no glossed Middle English questions or negatives with do. Chapter 7 gave the forms of do; this is all the sources let me say about its use.

What this chapter could not give

  • Questions. Neither article describes Middle English question formation, so I give no rule on inversion, and no example question.
  • Negative concord (several negatives in one sentence). Not described in what I read. The example I ne ysauȝ nauȝt shows ne and nauȝt together, but the article presents it as the second stage of one pattern, not as a rule about multiple negatives.
  • Dialect differences in negation, and Chaucer's practice.
  • Full sentences beyond the short examples above.

Words to know

TermMeaning
NegationSaying that something is not so
Jespersen's cycleThe pattern in which a negative word weakens, is strengthened by another, and is then replaced by it
CorpusA large collection of texts used for counting
AuxiliaryA helper verb, such as do
AspectWhether an action is seen as completed or ongoing

✏️ Try It Yourself

Think of the answer first, then click to check.

1. Name the three stages of negation in order.

Show answer

ne alone; ne ... not; not alone.

2. Translate ic ne secge.

Show answer

"I do not say" (Old English).

3. Where does nauȝt come from?

Show answer

Old English nawiht, "no thing".

4. In which period was ne + not the most common pattern, and with what share?

Show answer

1250–1350, at 67.7%.

5. By 1420–1500, what share of negation was not alone?

Show answer

98.2%.

6. Whose study do the figures come from, and what was counted?

Show answer

Phillip Wallage's, using the Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English; it counted sentential negation, excluding complex examples.

7. Why did word order become stricter, according to the Middle English article?

Show answer

Inflectional endings eroded, helped by Old Norse contact in the Danelaw.

8. What does the Do-support article say do contributed in Middle English?

Show answer

A meaning of aspect, probably perfective but sometimes imperfective.

9. Why does this chapter give no rule for Middle English questions?

Show answer

Neither source describes them, and the chapter does not fill the gap from memory.

Note on sources The negation material comes from Wikipedia's Jespersen's cycle (the English section as the page tool summarised it); the page cites Wallage, Tottie 1991 and van Gelderen 2014, none of which I read. The word-order remarks come from the first 100,000 of 152,228 characters of Middle English, which has no syntax section. The remark on do comes from Do-support, whose "Common uses" section covers modern rules only. I read no grammar book. The glosses of the table headings, the word definitions and my reading of the examples are mine and unverified.
Coming up in Chapter 9: Borrowed Words. French and Norse words and endings, and how the grammar absorbed them.