The Festival Boom

Korean Festivals and Traditional Life

Course 1 · Chapter 8 · The Festival Boom

Chapter 1 said that many Korean festivals are new. This chapter looks at that claim through three examples: a heritage-listed festival that was revived, a lantern festival created for a tourism campaign, and a small regional festival built on a half-remembered ferry route. It also follows up a promise from Chapter 5, to check how the Gangneung Dano Festival is described.

How this chapter was checked The facts here come from Wikipedia's articles on Gangneung Danoje, the Seoul Lantern Festival, Festivals in South Korea and Intangible cultural heritage of South Korea, as I read them. I read the Gangneung Danoje article in full and the others in part. I read no official festival sites, visitor statistics or the cited scholarship, so every figure below is an article's claim. The article for Gangneung cites a chapter by Kim Kwang Ok (2020) that I did not read.

The Broad Claim

The Festivals in South Korea article opens: "Many new festivals have originated in South Korea in response to the country's tourism initiatives. Contributing to this growth is a gradual change to a five-day work week and greater leisure." It gives no count of festivals and no dates for this growth, so I treat it as a stated trend and not a measured one. The article's own entries are also dated: its Hwacheon Sancheoneo Ice Festival entry gives 2012 dates, and its Seoul Lantern Festival entry describes November on Cheonggyecheon, which the newer article says is no longer the usual time.

A festival built on a forgotten route

The article's entry for the Jjokbae (Jokbae) Festival in Hwacheon shows how a festival can be made from a memory. It says a ferry route for salt ran between Incheon and Hwacheon in the Goryeo period, that dams have ended the water routes, and that "nobody remembers the ferry and the boats in Hwacheon at past any more". The festival, "started" in 2003, "reproduce[s] the images of boats" from that past, with a boat-building contest, valley hiking and farm stays. That is one entry's account of a festival whose theme is a lost practice and whose programme is mostly recreation. It is not a claim of continuity with anything older. The same article's Hwacheon Sancheoneo Ice Festival is described as held each January on the strength of the town's ice conditions, with no older tradition claimed.

A Revived Rite: Gangneung Danoje

Chapter 5 said the Gangneung Dano Festival is described as UNESCO-designated and promised to verify it. The Gangneung Danoje article says so directly: "Since 1967, it has been a National Intangible Cultural Heritage of South Korea, and since 2005 it has been on the UNESCO Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity." In the History section, it is "National Important Intangible Cultural Property No. 13". That settles the Chapter 5 flag, as the article's claim.

TopicWhat the article says
Length"Traditionally held for 47 days", from the 20th day of the 3rd lunar month to the 7th day of the 5th. The main events run from the 1st to the 7th day of the 5th month; earlier stages include ritual brewing, rites at a mountain-god shrine, a procession and a "marriage of the gods".
Purpose"To appease the local gods, and in turn to receive their blessings."
MixConfucian, shamanic and Buddhist elements; the main stage hosts shamanic rituals, mask plays and markets.
Origins"Unclear": "at least 400 years old, and possibly... over 1000 years old". A definite attestation is from 1603 (a scholar-official's 1611 text).
Colonial periodRepressed in 1910–1945, but merchants "were able to convince colonial authorities" to let some rites continue.
After the Korean WarResearch and recreation from the 1950s, using "Records from a Japanese survey in the 1930s and interviews from elders".
The stateThe group organising it "reportedly clashed" with a government "in general unfavorable to folk customs"; the government "reportedly became more open" in the late 1970s; folk customs became "sources of pride" in the 1980s; federal and state support rose in the 1990s and 2000s.
Scale"623,000 visitors to the festival in 2023"; 6,527 households donated 16,800 kg of rice for the ritual brewing that year.
Old, revived, or both? The article calls the festival's origins unclear and says it was nearly lost, then "reconstructed" from a colonial-era survey and elders' memories. It also says Gangneung is "reportedly the only city to have consistently hosted a Dano festival" through the colonial period and the war. These claims sit together without being reconciled: a continuous tradition and a reconstruction. The article's source list includes a chapter titled "After the heritage – The fate of Gangneng Danoje between religious ritual and cultural festival", which suggests scholars see tension between the festival's ritual role and its festival role, but I did not read it and report only its title. The article also describes the 2021 event as "the 13th Gangneung Dano Festival", which I cannot square with a rite said to be centuries old. I take it to count editions under a modern organising body, but the article does not say so.

A New Festival: the Seoul Lantern Festival

The Seoul Lantern Festival is a useful contrast. The article says it began in 2009, "to celebrate the 'Visit Korea Year 2010 to 2012'", and the Festivals article adds that the first one ran alongside the restored Cheonggyecheon stream. Lanterns link it to Buddha's Birthday (Chapter 6), but nothing in either article claims a ritual origin.

  • Growth, by the articles' figures. The 2009 festival drew "over 520,000" visitors by the Festivals article, which gives 12 days; the Seoul Lantern article says the first festival lasted 5 days. The two articles disagree on the length. For 2010, the Seoul article says 2.3 million visitors, including 370,000 foreign tourists; for 2014, 3.14 million, with 630,000 foreign visitors.
  • Change. The festival moved from November on Cheonggyecheon to December in Gwanghwamun Plaza from 2022 in one account, while the article's 2024 and 2025 sections place it on Cheonggyecheon again. The article is inconsistent about the venue, and I cannot say which is right.
  • Themes. They change every year: the history of Seoul, Baekje, world heritage, light art. The theme is chosen, not inherited.
The Jinju complaint The article's Criticism section says the city of Jinju "criticized the festival severely", calling it "a copy of their Jinju Namgang Yudeung Festival", which began in 2000 as a public requiem for about 70,000 soldiers and civilians who died in the 1593 battle at Jinju Castle. It reports that more than 20 Jinju associations asked for Seoul's festival to be discontinued, that there was a one-man protest at Seoul City Hall, and that the two cities agreed to change the Korean name of Seoul's festival. The Festivals article puts the Jinju festival's lantern origin in the 1592 siege, as a tool for signals and for messages between soldiers and families. Both are the articles' accounts and I did not check them. The dispute shows that a lantern festival can be a memorial to some and a tourist event to others, and that the same idea can be claimed by two places.

The Heritage System

The Intangible cultural heritage of South Korea article gives the frame for Gangneung's listing. It says national designations are maintained by the Cultural Heritage Administration, that there is a separate local-level designation administered by provinces or cities, and that "practices of particular importance can be designated as Important Intangible Cultural Properties". The system comes from "the 1962 Cultural Property Protection Law", which "was modelled on the Japanese 1950 Law", and the article says these early initiatives "influenced UNESCO" in its 2003 Convention. It says that as of 2025, twenty-three South Korean elements are inscribed on the UNESCO list. I did not read the 1962 law, the Convention or the Cultural Heritage Administration's own material, so I cannot say how designation works in practice.

Reading a Festival Claim

  1. Who started it, and why? A ritual's own community, a city tourism office and a campaign slogan produce different festivals, and the sources say which is which only in some cases.
  2. Continuous or reconstructed? "Revived from surveys and elders" and "never stopped" are different claims.
  3. Is a visitor figure comparable? A count of attendees at a free outdoor festival is not a count of participants in a ritual.
  4. Is the article current? Dates, venues and visitor counts in a list article can be out of date.

Exercises

Exercise 1

Give the two designations the Gangneung Danoje article gives, with years, and say which flag from Chapter 5 this settles. Then name two things the article says about how the festival was revived.

Exercise 2

Say when and why the Seoul Lantern Festival started, and give one disagreement between the two articles about it. Then describe the Jinju complaint and how it ended.

Exercise 3

Explain how the Jjokbae Festival differs from Gangneung Danoje in what it claims about the past. Then give two questions you would ask before calling any of the three festivals in this chapter "traditional".

Quick Reference

  • Boom claim: new festivals from tourism initiatives, a five-day work week and leisure; no counts given
  • Gangneung Danoje: national designation 1967 (No. 13); UNESCO list 2005; attested 1603; revived after the colonial period and war; 623,000 visitors in 2023
  • Seoul Lantern Festival: from 2009, for Visit Korea Year; themes change yearly; Jinju complained it copied the Namgang Yudeung Festival (from 2000)
  • Jjokbae Festival: from 2003; recreates a forgotten salt ferry route
  • Heritage system: 1962 Cultural Property Protection Law, modelled on Japan's 1950 law; national and local designations; 23 UNESCO elements as of 2025
  • Check: 2009 festival length, the Seoul venue, "13th" Dano count, all visitor figures

Next chapter: Two Festivals Up Close, which compares the Andong Mask Dance Festival and the Boryeong Mud Festival, and says plainly if either is poorly documented.