Exercise 2: A Red-or-Green-Only Status Dot Is a Real Accessibility Problem — Possible Solution ==================================================================== This is a real, measurable problem because it relies entirely on color to convey the server's own status, with nothing else - no label, no icon, no text - to distinguish the two states. This chapter's own prevalence data shows that roughly 1 in 12 men (about 8%) and roughly 1 in 200 women (about 0.5%) have congenital red-green color blindness, the most common form of color vision deficiency - and red-green is exactly the color pair being used here. For a meaningful share of real users, a red dot and a green dot can look genuinely indistinguishable, or close enough that the dashboard provides no reliable way for them to tell whether the server is up or down. This isn't a hypothetical edge case affecting a handful of people - it's a real, documented, sizable percentage of the user population, particularly among men, given how directly this dashboard is likely to be used by a technical audience. The direct fix, per this chapter's own design rule, is to never convey information with color alone - adding a label ("Online"/"Offline"), a distinct icon shape, or a text status alongside the color would let every user, including those with red-green color blindness, read the status reliably. ANSWER: This is a real accessibility problem because it uses only color - specifically red versus green, the exact pair affected by the most common form of color blindness - to convey status. Given that roughly 8% of men and 0.5% of women have red-green color blindness, this design is genuinely unreadable to a meaningful share of users. The fix is to add a label, icon, or text alongside the color so status doesn't rely on color perception alone. WHY THIS WORKS AS AN ANSWER ------------------------------ This correctly cites the chapter's own specific real prevalence figures and identifies red-green as exactly the color pair most affected, rather than treating color-blindness accessibility as a vague, unquantified concern.